The quantitative
easing programme is being scaled down and may well have reached its
limit. Remember, you read it here first.
It is not often I am right and all the other economists and financial
commentators are wrong so please allow me a fair dose of smugness on
this occasion. Already the experts are coming round to what I argued in
this column four months ago, that the Bank of England money printing
scheme would peak at £200 billion.
Let us have a quick recap. The Bank of England was originally granted up
to £150 billion to spend on buying government and company bonds in order
to mop up government debt and to get the economy going.
Back in July, after £125 billion had been dispensed, the bank asked the
government for permission to raise the ceiling to £175 billion. And here
the confusion began. Columnists were leaping up and down about ‘an extra
£50 billion’. That was wrong, as I pointed out. It was an extra £25
billion (plus the remaining £25 billion already included in the original
figure).
To muddy the waters further, it transpired that Governor Mervyn King did
in fact want an extra £50 billion (taking the total to £200 billion).
This again was misconstrued. Those headlines saying King wanted another
£75 billion and had got £50 billion should have said King’s extra £50
billion had been chopped in half by his own colleagues.
The difference, as I argued all along, was important. Commentators
talking about the higher figures were easily able to persuade themselves
to think in terms of yet higher figures, so the assumption grew that
King would soon persuade his fellow members of the monetary policy
committee to go above £200 billion.
However, the real situation was that MPC members had dragged their feet
over King’s extra £50 billion and that a compromise was likely: King
would eventually get his full £50 billion but no more. Faces saved all
round.
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Sources & Disclaimer
Copyright 2009 Hemscott Group Limited.
Hemscott is the UK registered trademark of Hemscott Group Limited.
Prices displayed on Hemscott.com are delayed by at least 15 minutes unless otherwise stated.
Hemscott: Log in | Register
Advanced Search
Quantitative easing is winding down: I told you so
Rodney Hobson, 06/11/09 11:57
The quantitative easing programme is being scaled down and may well have reached its limit--you read it here first
Subscribe to Hemscott News RSS Feed Share Hemscott News via the Web
The quantitative easing programme is being scaled down and may well have reached its limit. Remember, you read it here first.
It is not often I am right and all the other economists and financial commentators are wrong so please allow me a fair dose of smugness on this occasion. Already the experts are coming round to what I argued in this column four months ago, that the Bank of England money printing scheme would peak at £200 billion.
Let us have a quick recap. The Bank of England was originally granted up to £150 billion to spend on buying government and company bonds in order to mop up government debt and to get the economy going.
Back in July, after £125 billion had been dispensed, the bank asked the government for permission to raise the ceiling to £175 billion. And here the confusion began. Columnists were leaping up and down about ‘an extra £50 billion’. That was wrong, as I pointed out. It was an extra £25 billion (plus the remaining £25 billion already included in the original figure).
To muddy the waters further, it transpired that Governor Mervyn King did in fact want an extra £50 billion (taking the total to £200 billion). This again was misconstrued. Those headlines saying King wanted another £75 billion and had got £50 billion should have said King’s extra £50 billion had been chopped in half by his own colleagues.
The difference, as I argued all along, was important. Commentators talking about the higher figures were easily able to persuade themselves to think in terms of yet higher figures, so the assumption grew that King would soon persuade his fellow members of the monetary policy committee to go above £200 billion.
However, the real situation was that MPC members had dragged their feet over King’s extra £50 billion and that a compromise was likely: King would eventually get his full £50 billion but no more. Faces saved all round.
Read the full article here.
Contact our editorial team
Financial Information for
Company Summary | Company NewsTerms of Use | Privacy Policy | Sources & Disclaimer Copyright 2009 Hemscott Group Limited.
Hemscott is the UK registered trademark of Hemscott Group Limited.
Prices displayed on Hemscott.com are delayed by at least 15 minutes unless otherwise stated.